<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Israel Archives - Global NIPT Consortium</title>
	<atom:link href="https://niptconsortium.com/category/israel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://niptconsortium.com/category/israel/</link>
	<description>Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) Consortium</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:28:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Clinical utility of expanded non-invasive prenatal screening compared with chromosomal microarray analysis in over 8000 pregnancies without major structural anomaly.</title>
		<link>https://niptconsortium.com/clinical-utility-of-expanded-non-invasive-prenatal-screening-compared-with-chromosomal-microarray-analysis-in-over-8000-pregnancies-without-major-structural-anomaly/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NIPTadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2023]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Experience / Clinical Utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAAs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://niptconsortium.com/?p=9987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Maya I, Salzer Sheelo L, Brabbing-Goldstein D, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61(6):698-704. doi:10.1002/uog.26177. Tags: Clinical Experience / Clinical Utility, 2023, Israel, RAAs, CNVs “Conclusions: 5-NIPS and even genome-wide NIPS would miss 63.9% and 54.1% of clinically significant CMA findings [in pregnancies without major structural anomalies], respectively. The added value of 5-NIPS expanded to detect [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://niptconsortium.com/clinical-utility-of-expanded-non-invasive-prenatal-screening-compared-with-chromosomal-microarray-analysis-in-over-8000-pregnancies-without-major-structural-anomaly/">Clinical utility of expanded non-invasive prenatal screening compared with chromosomal microarray analysis in over 8000 pregnancies without major structural anomaly.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://niptconsortium.com">Global NIPT Consortium</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maya I, Salzer Sheelo L, Brabbing-Goldstein D, et al. <em>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.</em> 2023;61(6):698-704. doi:10.1002/uog.26177.</p>
<p><strong><em>Tags:</em></strong><em> Clinical Experience / Clinical Utility, 2023, Israel, RAAs, CNVs</em></p>
<ul>
<li>“Conclusions: 5-NIPS and even genome-wide NIPS would miss 63.9% and 54.1% of clinically significant CMA findings [in pregnancies without major structural anomalies], respectively. The added value of 5-NIPS expanded to detect common microdeletions over 5-NIPS is about 0.035%, and the overall added value of genome-wide NIPS aimed at large CNVs is about 0.14%, both much lower compared with the added value of CMA (0.91%).”</li>
</ul>
<p>The post <a href="https://niptconsortium.com/clinical-utility-of-expanded-non-invasive-prenatal-screening-compared-with-chromosomal-microarray-analysis-in-over-8000-pregnancies-without-major-structural-anomaly/">Clinical utility of expanded non-invasive prenatal screening compared with chromosomal microarray analysis in over 8000 pregnancies without major structural anomaly.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://niptconsortium.com">Global NIPT Consortium</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants in low-risk pregnancies, following exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings.</title>
		<link>https://niptconsortium.com/residual-risk-for-clinically-significant-copy-number-variants-in-low-risk-pregnancies-following-exclusion-of-noninvasive-prenatal-screening-detectable-findings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NIPTadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2022]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Experience / Clinical Utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAAs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://niptconsortium.com/?p=10072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Maya I, Salzer Sheelo L, Brabbing-Goldstein D, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(4):562.e1-562.e8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.016. Open Access: Learn more Tags: Clinical Experience / Clinical Utility, 2022, Israel, RAAs, CNVs “Of the 7235 pregnancies, clinically significant copy number variants were demonstrated in 87 cases (1.2%). The residual risk following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening was 1.07% [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://niptconsortium.com/residual-risk-for-clinically-significant-copy-number-variants-in-low-risk-pregnancies-following-exclusion-of-noninvasive-prenatal-screening-detectable-findings/">Residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants in low-risk pregnancies, following exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://niptconsortium.com">Global NIPT Consortium</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maya I, Salzer Sheelo L, Brabbing-Goldstein D, et al. <em>Am J Obstet Gynecol.</em> 2022;226(4):562.e1-562.e8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.016. Open Access: <a href="https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(21)01209-6/fulltext" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Learn more</a></p>
<p><em>Tags: Clinical Experience / Clinical Utility, 2022, Israel, RAAs, CNVs</em></p>
<ul>
<li>“Of the 7235 pregnancies, clinically significant copy number variants were demonstrated in 87 cases (1.2%). The residual risk following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening was 1.07% (1/94) for 3-noninvasive prenatal screening, 0.78% (1/129) for 5- noninvasive prenatal screening, 0.74% (1/136) for 5- noninvasive prenatal screening including common microdeletions, and 0.68% (1/147) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening.”</li>
<li>“Conclusion: The residual risk of clinically significant copy number variants in pregnancies without structural sonographic anomalies is appreciable and depends on the noninvasive prenatal screening extent and maternal age.”</li>
</ul>
<p>The post <a href="https://niptconsortium.com/residual-risk-for-clinically-significant-copy-number-variants-in-low-risk-pregnancies-following-exclusion-of-noninvasive-prenatal-screening-detectable-findings/">Residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants in low-risk pregnancies, following exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://niptconsortium.com">Global NIPT Consortium</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
