<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>United States Archives - Global NIPT Consortium</title>
	<atom:link href="https://niptconsortium.com/category/united-states/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://niptconsortium.com/category/united-states/</link>
	<description>Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) Consortium</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Laboratory performance of genome-wide cfDNA for copy number variants as compared to prenatal microarray.</title>
		<link>https://niptconsortium.com/laboratory-performance-of-genome-wide-cfdna-for-copy-number-variants-as-compared-to-prenatal-microarray/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NIPTadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2023]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laboratory Performance / Laboratory Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://niptconsortium.com/?p=9962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Soster E, Tynan J, Gibbons C, et al. Mol Cytogenet. 2023;16(1):10. Published 2023 Jun 10. doi:10.1186/s13039-023-00642-4 Open Access: Learn more Tags: Laboratory Performance / Laboratory Experience, 2023, United States, CNVs   Reviewed 701 high-risk pregnancies with both GW-NIPT and prenatal microarray. For aneuploidies, CNVs ≥7Mb, and select microdeletions, sensitivity was 93.8%, specificity was 97.3%, and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://niptconsortium.com/laboratory-performance-of-genome-wide-cfdna-for-copy-number-variants-as-compared-to-prenatal-microarray/">Laboratory performance of genome-wide cfDNA for copy number variants as compared to prenatal microarray.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://niptconsortium.com">Global NIPT Consortium</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soster E, Tynan J, Gibbons C, et al. Mol Cytogenet. 2023;16(1):10. Published 2023 Jun 10. doi:10.1186/s13039-023-00642-4 Open Access: <a href="https://molecularcytogenetics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13039-023-00642-4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Learn more</a></p>
<p><strong><em>Tags:</em></strong><em> Laboratory Performance / Laboratory Experience, 2023, United States, CNVs  </em></p>
<ul>
<li>Reviewed 701 high-risk pregnancies with both GW-NIPT and prenatal microarray.</li>
<li>For aneuploidies, CNVs ≥7Mb, and select microdeletions, sensitivity was 93.8%, specificity was 97.3%, and PPV was 63.8%.</li>
<li>“Conclusions: While microarray provides the most robust assessment of fetal CNVs, this study suggests that genome wide cfDNA can reliably screen for large CNVs in a high-risk cohort. Informed consent and adequate pretest counseling are essential to ensuring patients understand the benefits and limitations of all prenatal testing and screening options.”</li>
</ul>
<p>The post <a href="https://niptconsortium.com/laboratory-performance-of-genome-wide-cfdna-for-copy-number-variants-as-compared-to-prenatal-microarray/">Laboratory performance of genome-wide cfDNA for copy number variants as compared to prenatal microarray.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://niptconsortium.com">Global NIPT Consortium</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genome-wide cell-free DNA screening: a focus on copy-number variants</title>
		<link>https://niptconsortium.com/genome-wide-cell-free-dna-screening-a-focus-on-copy-number-variants/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NIPTadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2021 02:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2021]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laboratory Performance / Laboratory Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://niptconsortium.com/?p=9682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Rafalko J, Soster E, Caldwell S, et al. Genet Med. 2021;23(10):1847-1853. doi:10.1038/s41436-021-01227-5. Open Access: Learn more Tags: Laboratory Performance / Laboratory Experience, 2021, United States, CNVs In a cohort of 86,902 Expanded NIPT samples, this publication focuses on the 490 (0.56%) cases that were screen positive for at least 1 subchromosomal partial deletion/duplication. Diagnostic outcomes [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://niptconsortium.com/genome-wide-cell-free-dna-screening-a-focus-on-copy-number-variants/">Genome-wide cell-free DNA screening: a focus on copy-number variants</a> appeared first on <a href="https://niptconsortium.com">Global NIPT Consortium</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rafalko J, Soster E, Caldwell S, et al. Genet Med. 2021;23(10):1847-1853. doi:10.1038/s41436-021-01227-5. Open Access: <a href="https://www.gimjournal.org/article/S1098-3600(21)05137-6/fulltext" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Learn more</a></p>
<p><strong><em>Tags:</em></strong><em> Laboratory Performance / Laboratory Experience, 2021, United States, CNVs</em></p>
<ul>
<li>In a cohort of 86,902 Expanded NIPT samples, this publication focuses on the 490 (0.56%) cases that were screen positive for at least 1 subchromosomal partial deletion/duplication. Diagnostic outcomes were available in 50% of these cases, in which the PPV was found to be greater than 70%.</li>
</ul>
<p>The post <a href="https://niptconsortium.com/genome-wide-cell-free-dna-screening-a-focus-on-copy-number-variants/">Genome-wide cell-free DNA screening: a focus on copy-number variants</a> appeared first on <a href="https://niptconsortium.com">Global NIPT Consortium</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants</title>
		<link>https://niptconsortium.com/three-years-of-clinical-experience-with-a-genome-wide-cfdna-screening-test-for-aneuploidies-and-copy-number-variants/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NIPTadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 02:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2021]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Experience / Clinical Utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laboratory Performance / Laboratory Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://niptconsortium.com/?p=9680</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>[published correction appears in Genet Med. 2021 May 6;:]. Soster E, Boomer T, Hicks S, et al. Genet Med. 2021;23(7):1349-1355. doi:10.1038/s41436-021-01135-8. Open Access: Learn more Tags: Laboratory Performance / Laboratory Experience, Clinical Experience / Clinical Utility, 2021, United States, RAAs, CNVs This publication is a retrospective analysis of over 55,000 samples submitted for Expanded NIPT [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://niptconsortium.com/three-years-of-clinical-experience-with-a-genome-wide-cfdna-screening-test-for-aneuploidies-and-copy-number-variants/">Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants</a> appeared first on <a href="https://niptconsortium.com">Global NIPT Consortium</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[published correction appears in Genet Med. 2021 May 6;:]. Soster E, Boomer T, Hicks S, et al. Genet Med. 2021;23(7):1349-1355. doi:10.1038/s41436-021-01135-8. Open Access: <a href="https://www.gimjournal.org/article/S1098-3600(21)05039-5/fulltext" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Learn more</a></p>
<p><strong><em>Tags:</em></strong><em> Laboratory Performance / Laboratory Experience, Clinical Experience / Clinical Utility, 2021, United States, RAAs, CNVs</em></p>
<ul>
<li>This publication is a retrospective analysis of over 55,000 samples submitted for Expanded NIPT to the laboratory, with diagnostic outcomes available in over 40% of screen positive cases. The publication reports on testing indications, demographics, results, and performance. The authors noted that indications shifted during the 3-year period, with a decrease in referrals for ‘ultrasound findings’ (22.0% to 12.0%) and an increase in referrals of ‘no known high-risk indication’ (3.0% to 16.6%). Of the screen positive results, they reported that 25% would have been missed with NIPT limited to the common aneuploidies. They concluded that, although a broader patient population is using Expanded NIPT, the positivity rates and genome-wide events have remained stable at approximately 5% and 25%, respectively.</li>
</ul>
<p>The post <a href="https://niptconsortium.com/three-years-of-clinical-experience-with-a-genome-wide-cfdna-screening-test-for-aneuploidies-and-copy-number-variants/">Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants</a> appeared first on <a href="https://niptconsortium.com">Global NIPT Consortium</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
